Why I doubt the official story of 9/11

Article by Cal Nogov on Dec. 30, 2015


I don’t just doubt the official story of 9/11, I reject it entirely.  If you still believe the official story of 9/11, this article will be a simple summary of why the official story is a lie.  It’s a jumping off point for deeper study.

1. The visual evidence.  The buildings came down in what appeared to be a controlled demolition.  We’ve all seen buildings imploded by controlled demolition.  It’s a spectator sport in this country.  It’s not normal for a building that falls from structural damage to drop straight down symmetrically into its footprint.  When buildings fall from structural damage, they tip over or they partially collapse.  We may not be experts, but our own eyes tell us this is not normal.  If a three headed cat appeared on my doorstep, I don’t need to be a veterinarian to realize, that just ain’t normal.

2. The professionals.  There are thousands of Architects, Engineers, Pilots, explosive and demolition experts, scientists, etc. that all claim it was controlled demolition.  These aren’t tinfoil hatters.  These people are professionals in their fields and are saying it is impossible for those buildings to collapse the way they did without being a controlled demolition.

3.  The empirical evidence.  In the history of steel framed high rise buildings there has never been a case where fire has caused a building to collapse.  The only exceptions are World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7.  Never before or since that day on September 11, 2001 has a steel framed building collapsed due to fire (and high rise fires are quite common).  But this is the official story.  The official story goes that the fires weakened the structures to the point of collapse.  So the world trade center buildings are either the worlds most incredible anomaly in the history of steel framed buildings or the official story is a lie.


4. The cover up.  The 9/11 commission report was 500+ pages of hooey.  The report was done haphazardly.  The evidence (the buildings remains) were then swiftly whisked away to be destroyed so that no one could re-examine them.  The criminal quickly destroys the evidence.  No evidence.  No crime.

Here is a excellent documentary about it.  It is an hour and a half long, but when I watched it, that hour and a half flew by.  It was as engaging as a good action movie.